Difference between revisions of "Bibliography"

Line 1: Line 1:
== Getting started ==
== Getting started ==


Readers interested in authorship attribution – its history, theories, methods – may be intimidated by the sheer quantity of scholarship. The following titles are recommended as introductory reading.
Readers interested in authorship attribution may understandably find the sheer quantity of scholarship on the subject intimidating. For an engaging introduction to attribution study – its history, principles, and methods – written for the non-specialist reader, the Generals Editors recommend Harold Love's ''Attributing Authorship: An Introduction'' (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002).  


For an overview of attribution studies of Shakespeare and early modern drama, see Gabriel Egan's chapter, 'A History of Shakespearean Authorship Attribution', in ''The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion'', ed. by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan (Oxford UP, 2017), pp. 27–47. For a primer in Shakespeare authorship attribution, see Hugh Craig, 'Shakespeare and Authorship Attribution Methodologies', in ''The Arden Research Companion to Shakespeare and Textual Studies'', ed. by Lukas Erne (Arden Shakespeare, 2021), pp. 225–43.





Revision as of 20:18, 3 September 2021

Getting started

Readers interested in authorship attribution may understandably find the sheer quantity of scholarship on the subject intimidating. For an engaging introduction to attribution study – its history, principles, and methods – written for the non-specialist reader, the Generals Editors recommend Harold Love's Attributing Authorship: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002).

For an overview of attribution studies of Shakespeare and early modern drama, see Gabriel Egan's chapter, 'A History of Shakespearean Authorship Attribution', in The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion, ed. by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan (Oxford UP, 2017), pp. 27–47. For a primer in Shakespeare authorship attribution, see Hugh Craig, 'Shakespeare and Authorship Attribution Methodologies', in The Arden Research Companion to Shakespeare and Textual Studies, ed. by Lukas Erne (Arden Shakespeare, 2021), pp. 225–43.


Works Cited

This section supplies bibliographical information for scholarship cited in CADRE entries.


C

  • Craig, Hugh, ‘Shakespeare’s Vocabulary: Myth and Reality’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 62.1 (2011), 53–74.

E

  • Elliott, Ward E.Y., and Robert J. Valenza, ‘Shakespeare’s Vocabulary: Did It Dwarf All Others?’, in Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language: Transdisciplinary Approaches, ed. by Mireille Ravassat and Jonathan Culpeper (London: Continuum), pp. 34–57.

G

  • Greatley-Hirsch, Brett, ‘Computational Studies’, in The Arden Research Handbook of Contemporary Shakespeare Criticism, ed. by Evelyn Gajowski (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2020), pp. 205–21.

K

  • Kahan, Jeffrey, ‘“I tell you what mine author says”: A Brief History of Stylometrics’, ELH, 82.3 (2015), 815–44.